01.27.05

OS X Software for Writers

Tagged as ,

Writers these days are dependent on computers — they make archiving, editing, and copying your work so much easier that going back to the days of the typewriter is unthinkable to all but the most die hard traditionalist. But most word processors weren’t created with a writer’s needs in mind. Nor is a word processor the only software tool writers need: other useful options include a database for storing and sorting ideas, a quick and flexible brainstorming tool, and a document formatter for submitting work to publishers.

As an aspiring writer, I’ve spent a lot of quality procrastination time surveying the tools available for writers using OS X, and in this post I’ll summarize my findings, organized by the stage of the writing process each program is designed to help, and I’ll describe what’s in my own personal writing toolbox.

Idea Gathering

VoodooPad, by Flying Meat Software, uses the wiki concept to build a personal idea database. If you’ve ever used a wiki, there’s virtually nothing to learn: you’ll be up and running in minutes. If you’re unfamiliar with the wiki way of formatting a document, VoodooPad comes with a complete tutorial. I’ve become completely dependent on this program — there’s no faster or simpler way to record, edit, and organize ideas for later reference. VoodooPad is $24.95 and worth every penny, but there’s also a Lite version available for free.

I also tried Circus Ponies Notebook and AquaMinds NoteTaker, and found both lacking. They’re essentially the same program: both grew out of a notebook outliner for NeXT systems called NoteBook, and in fact both still contain some of the original code from that program. That’s not to say there aren’t differences — I won’t go into a full comparison here, but the curious can find one at ATPM. Suffice it to say, however, that I found both awkward, slow, confusing, and overpriced (NoteTaker is $69.95; NoteBook is $49.95; demos and academic discounts are available for both). Your mileage may vary, of course, and I know some people swear by them, but to me it seemed they put more effort into the spiral-bound interface than usability. I’ll stick with VoodooPad.

One other program bears mention here: MacJournal. MacJournal used to be available for free, but as of January 4 it’s been “republished” by Mariner Software as a commercial product ($29.95 boxed; $19.95 for the download edition). I’m still using the freeware version, so I can’t comment on any changes as of version 3.0, but I’ve always found it to be a solid product, perfect for keeping a personal diary or dream journal.

Outlining

For fleshing out an idea before starting the writing process itself, I like NovaMind because it combines the features of a brainstorming/mind mapping tool and an outliner. You start with your core concept in the middle of the screen and build branches outward, like a flowchart. Then, when it’s time to structure your ideas, you can switch to Outline view or Screenplay view and follow your story step by step, increasing or decreasing the level of detail as needed. You can also export your map in a variety of formats, including PowerPoint, XML, RTF, PDF, or even a Java-based web presentation. At $79 for the standard edition, it’s not what I’d call a bargain — and of all the programs I’m listing in this entry, I consider NovaMind the least essential for most writers. Still, the combination of mind mapping and outlining in one tool is pretty convenient, and the program is stable and easy to use, so if you’ve got the money and the feature set appeals to you I can recommend it without reservation. There’s also a screenwriter’s edition for $99, but the only unique features it offers are duplicated by Final Draft, which is the one program you need to be using if you’re a screenwriter on a Mac. Save the extra money and go with the standard edition.

Writing

The big players in this field right now are Ulysses (100 €) and CopyWrite ($29.99). I’ve tried and enjoyed them both, but in the end my recommendation goes to CopyWrite. Both programs organize your project as a set of individual subdocuments: each chapter, each character outline, each location description is its own document, and each can have notes attached to it for future reference. Each document can also have its own status — draft or final, for example. You can add and remove categories to fit your way of working. And when the project is done and it’s time to format it for submission, you can export your chapters in a variety of formats.

Exporting documents is one area in which Ulysses has the lead: it can save your work in plain text, RTF, or Latex formats, and an SDK is available so third-party developers can create export plugins. Another nice feature of Ulysses is its fullscreen mode, which removes everything from view except the text you’re working on.

Both Ulysses and CopyWrite de-emphasize formatting and layout — these are not word processors or desktop publishing programs. You’re expected to structure and type your document first, and fiddle with the appearance later, in a separate program. I like that idea, especially since different markets often have different rules regarding document format. For my taste, though, Ulysses takes this concept too far: even italicizing text has apparently been deemed an unnecessary distraction. One might wonder what one is expected to do if one wants to emphasize a given word, or set off a passage of internal monologue. As it turns out, the developers expect you to think up some sort of plain text delimiter, such as underscores or asterisks, and then set the export feature to convert those into something else, like rich text italics or LaTeX commands. I don’t have a problem with that per se, except that if I’m going to be using some sort of text delimiter anyway, why can’t I just use Command-I to italicize text on screen and then let the export feature convert that to the relevant command? That way the program would work the same as every other Cocoa-based program, and I wouldn’t have to learn anything new or take any extra steps.

And, in fact, that’s exactly what CopyWrite does.

As a matter of fact, CopyWrite does pretty much everything exactly the way I expect it to, and that’s what I like most about it. I don’t think I’ve resorted to the manual yet — the options are self-explanatory, and the interface is simple and elegant. It keeps a word count for both each individual document and the project as a whole, and the project word count only includes words from the documents you specify. You can associate not just notes but also URLs with each document, or even create a link within a document — very handy if your project involves a lot of online research. And while the emphasis is still on the text, there are enough formatting options to make the job of writing pleasant — you can bold, italicize, and underline text, change the font, line spacing, and color, and specify how CopyWrite should handle paragraph breaks (space between paragraphs, indentation, both, or neither). It’s intuitive, simple, and powerful, and if I had to choose just one program to handle my writing, it would be CopyWrite.

Formatting

Formatting is a necessary evil for all writers, but our needs in this area aren’t particularly complex because it isn’t the writer’s job to lay out a story or book — the publisher has professionals for that. We do have to format documents properly for submission, however, so some sort of word processor or DTP software is needed. Just about any will do, actually, from Microsoft Word right down to TextEdit if you’re so inclined, but the ideal lies somewhere in between.

There are several OS X word processors that aim to fit this niche, including Nisus Writer Express ($59) and Mariner Write ($59.95), but for my taste the perfect balance of features and simplicity is found in Mellel ($39). Mellel offers all the formatting options a writer is likely to need, including things like multiple chains of footnotes in a single document, which you won’t find even in bloated, high-priced competitors like Microsoft Word. That’s because Mellel focuses on features needed by scholars and writers, whereas the big boys go for the lowest common denominator and emphasize features needed in a multi-user office environment. This also happens to make Mellel a better word processor for home use, since most of us are unlikely to use, say, a Track Changes feature when typing up a letter. Mellel’s menus and preferences aren’t cluttered with stuff you’ll never need. Since Mellel is also fast, easy to use, and inexpensive, it’s an excellent choice as your primary word processor if you don’t absolutely need 100% MS Office compatibility. If you happen to be a writer or research scholar, it’s the ideal solution at any price.

Conclusion

Apple’s reputation as the platform of choice for creative work is borne out by the wide range of software available to help writers with every stage of their work. As long as this article is, I’ve only scratched the surface of what’s out there — every section of this survey could have included at least two more programs, and all of them have their uses and their loyal fans. And there are also specialty programs that were beyond the scope of this survey. I mentioned, for example, Final Draft, the most popular software for writing scripts of all types, but there’s also Movie Magic Screenwriter for the same job, or even Final Draft AV, which includes features specifically aimed at audio-visual scripts like advertisements and presentations. Since every writer’s process is unique, every writer has different needs. Fortunately, all of the software I’ve reviewed here is available in demo form, so you can try it out yourself before spending any money.

Having tried it all myself, I’ve decided on my own personal novel writing software toolbox, and it seems to be working well for me thus far. Here it is again, in descending order of importance:

  • CopyWrite — the single most important writing tool I know.
  • VoodooPad — a fast, easy to use idea database.
  • Mellel — a word processor created with writers’ needs in mind.
  • NovaMind — an intuitive brainstorming and outlining tool.
  • MacJournal — for tracking my dreams and experiences.

15 Comments »

  1. From Behind the Wall of Sleep Said:

    April 25, 2005 at 7:24 pm

    [...] dooPad. Oh, and apparently I’m not the only one who thinks so. I found Nicholas at Acetylene.net, who recommends VoodooPad too. Of course, he says to use Vo [...]

  2. Memoria de la Foto Said:

    January 28, 2005 at 4:26 pm

    A Wiki Your Future?
    In my work, I do a lot of brainstoming. That might sound like something that would be a lot of fun to do for a living, and it is. But, like anything you do a lot, over time it becomes a process in which you use a lot of tools to get the job done as q…

  3. MichaelD Said:

    January 30, 2005 at 9:20 am

    I agree there are many other reasons for buying a Mac, I just haven’t really rationalized the whole thing. Still thinking about it though. Do you know if the new ones have the high resolution screens and wide aspect that some of the newer pc’s have? Makes a nice package for someone that has to show his work to people all the time (me).

    On a different note, the MoinMoin wiki brought up another side issue – What markup does VooDooPad use? MoinMoin uses the more or less standard wiki conventions but you can add textile.py to the processors directory and use textile markup too. Nice to know but I haven’t tried it yet.

  4. Nicholas Said:

    January 30, 2005 at 9:34 am

    The 15-inch and 17-inch Powerbooks both have relatively wide aspect ratios; it’s most notable on the 17, which has a 1440×900 native resolution (the resolution on the 15 is 1280×854, and on 12-inchers like mine it’s 1024×768). I won’t say the 17-inch Powerbook is inexpensive, but it’s quite a nice machine. Personally, I went with the 12 — and I’d do so again — because I wanted to be able to lug it around with me without breaking my back. I have hooked it up to an external projector for presentations.

    VoodooPad uses a somewhat simplified version of the wiki formatting conventions — for example, in a normal wiki, if you wanted to make a link out of two separate words without resorting to CamelCaps, you’d put those words in square brackets. With VoodooPad, you’d highlight those words and hit Command-L (for Link). There’s also a plugin API through which I’d imagine you could create alternate syntaxes, but I haven’t tried it yet.

  5. MichaelD Said:

    January 30, 2005 at 10:17 am

    Yes, I looked this morning – there is no question the Powerbooks would do what I need. The base version I coulld get by with though is the 15 inch. Not because I don’t have access to a good projector when I travel, more because it would be tiring to my eyes to work on the 12inch screen all day.

    At $2K – they are out of my budget though and beyond that I would need to buy MS Office to have compatibility with documents we produce. It doesn’t look likely in the near future as much as I would like it to be….

  6. Mark Said:

    May 22, 2005 at 11:04 am

    I’ve just got to say, thanks so much for writing this analysis, Nicholas. I have become so sick of the way MS word gets in the way of you working, and I’ve been researching tons about all the different alternatives for writing on a Mac. Your article was a fantastic summary of applications, that actually matched all the research I did (I also found copywrite and mellel to be fantastic)

  7. mariarose Said:

    August 2, 2005 at 12:22 pm

    thanks so much for this info. I had spent hours online and talking with big writers’ stores and no one could tell me what software to get for writing on mac. Right here is what I was looking for.

  8. ben Said:

    September 14, 2005 at 11:26 pm

    other useful options include a database for storing and sorting ideas, a quick and flexible brainstorming tool, and a document formatter for submitting work to publishers.
    I highly recommend Tinderbox for Eastgate Software, http://eastgate.com/Tinderbox/ , which combines these three functions and many more, in a very flexible tool.

  9. brandon Said:

    March 20, 2006 at 12:03 pm

    a great post, and one that i will be returning to. thanks very much!

  10. Gaijin Said:

    May 7, 2006 at 12:58 pm

    Excellent article. It introduced me to the world of software for writers in OS X a few months ago after I switched from the Windows apps.

    Just one comment — after testing pretty much every application for the actual act of writing there is, I stopped at Ulysses. It has so much power and elegance under the surface. Just thought I’d mention.

  11. Jake Said:

    August 14, 2006 at 7:35 pm

    Wow! I never even thought to think of alternative word processors for writers – I just assumed everyone used Word and that was that. I can’t wait to try this.

    I was already using NovaMind at work for project managerment, and now I’m experimenting with using it for my writing.

    Thanks!

  12. Andy Said:

    January 21, 2007 at 11:42 am

    Thanks a lot for this article. I have been looking at something reltively simple for my partner’s 13 year old son to use on hid Mac Mini. Storyist looked good initially, but may be overly complex, so after reading your advice I think that I will look closer at CopyWrite.

    Thank you again

  13. OS/X software for writers : BOSS logic Said:

    May 26, 2007 at 6:22 pm

    [...] stumbled on this excellent article providing a good summary of OS/X applications for writers. In my never-ending search for better [...]

  14. Pete Said:

    October 16, 2009 at 5:11 am

    Very good article, thank you. I was using the Trial of CopyWrite and it seemed like a great program but there were some features it lacked. I just stumbled upon Scrivener and I’m very impressed. I can use it to create an outline, import documents, easily change the order of things, select multiple documents to work on at the same time in the same text editor, and use a completely different font for printing than I do for reading.

    URL: http://www.literatureandlatte.com/scrivener.html

  15. Duncan Said:

    December 9, 2009 at 8:50 am

    Thanks for that summary. I have an old version of Dramatica Pro on the windows partition on my mac and i’m trying to use that. WAY TOO COMPLICATED. Maybe I should use New Novelist and take it from there.

Leave a Comment